United States v. Davis

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Davis

279 F. App'x 945

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 4, 2008·No. No. 07-11051·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Scott Benjamin, counsel for Maurice Davis, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Davis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Scott Benjamin, counsel for Maurice Davis, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Davis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Davis, 279 F. App'x 945 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

279 F. App'x 945 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related