United States v. Davis
76 M.J. 68
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 M.J. 224 →
Opinion
CCA 20150100. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER JUDGE JAMES W. HERRING AND JUDGE PAULETTE V. BURTON, JUDGES ON THE COURT OF MILITARY COMMISSION REVIEW, WERE STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED TO SIT ON THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, AND EVEN IF THEY WERE STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED TO BE ASSIGNED TO THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, WHETHER THEIR SERVICE ON BOTH COURTS VIOLATED THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE GIVEN THEIR NEWLY ATTAINED STATUS AS A SUPERIOR OFFICER.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Davis, 76 M.J. 68 (Ark. 2017).
76 M.J. 68 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.