United States v. Davidson
This text of 25 F. Cas. 773 (United States v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said that it was perhaps in the discretion of the Court to allow it, but that the defendants could not claim it as a matter of right; and that neither can be examined as a witness [577]*577for the other unless it should appear that there was no evidence against one; in which case the jury may acquit him, and then he may be examined for the other; but if there be any evidence against him he cannot be examined. 1 Chitty, Cr. L. 626, 627.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 F. Cas. 773, 4 D.C. 576, 4 Cranch 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-davidson-circtddc-1835.