United States v. Davidson
This text of 131 F. App'x 592 (United States v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Robert Dale Davidson appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his “petition to dismiss indictment challenging jurisdiction of district court on fatally flawed filing of indictment pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b) and (a).”
Davidson has already filed several 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions, and the factual predicate for the instant “petition” states a claim that is appropriate for § 2255 motion. Accordingly, the district court properly denied the petition as an unauthorized second or successive § 2255 motion, as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3) and 2255.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 F. App'x 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-davidson-ca9-2005.