United States v. David Williams
This text of 5 F.3d 533 (United States v. David Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
5 F.3d 533
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Appellee,
v.
David WILLIAMS, Appellant.
No. 93-1484
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: August 18, 1993.
Filed: September 9, 1993.
Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
David Williams appeals his conviction and sentence on four counts of narcotics-related offenses. Mr. Williams challenges the trial court's restrictions on cross-examination of one government witness, the prosecutor's use of allegedly perjured testimony by another government witness, and the trial court's failure to find sentencing entrapment and refusal to grant a downward departure from the appropriate sentencing guidelines range on that basis.
We have thoroughly considered the arguments of the parties and the materials submitted. We affirm the trial court.1 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable William C. Stuart, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation in the Northern District of Iowa
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 F.3d 533, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30261, 1993 WL 349210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-williams-ca8-1993.