United States v. David Ward

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 27, 2012
• Docket: 12-7359
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7359

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, v.

DAVID CLARENCE WARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:02-cr-00063-MR-1)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Clarence Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Clarence Ward appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motion to reopen his criminal case. Ward

asserted that his felon in possession of a firearm conviction

was a lesser included offense of his armed bank robbery

conviction. However, neither the federal statutes nor the Rules

of Criminal and Appellate Procedure provide for a motion to

reopen or a motion for reconsideration in a criminal case. Ward

must seek relief under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2241, 2255 (West Supp.

2012). United States v. Breit, 754 F.2d 526, 530–31 (4th Cir.

1985). Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process

AFFIRMED