United States v. David W. Lanier
43 F.3d 1033, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 214, 1995 WL 13861
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 4, 1995·No. 93-5608·Published·Cited by 16 cases
Opinion
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. David W. Lanier, 43 F.3d 1033, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 214, 1995 WL 13861 (6th Cir. 1995).
43 F.3d 1033 (United States v. David W. Lanier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Jackson
Sixth Circuit, 2008
United States v. Gray
521 F.3d 514 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Martinez
59 F. App'x 638 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Lanier
173 F. Supp. 2d 779 (W.D. Tennessee, 2001)
United States v. Lanier
Sixth Circuit, 2000
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.
2 F. Supp. 2d 1409 (D. Kansas, 1998)
United States v. Lanier
520 U.S. 259 (Supreme Court, 1997)
United States v. Ruth Alston Breeding
109 F.3d 308 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
Gary Randall Hoxsie v. Dareld Kerby, Warden Tom Udall, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
108 F.3d 1239 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Branham
97 F.3d 835 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
Grant v. Rivers
920 F. Supp. 769 (E.D. Michigan, 1996)
United States v. David W. Lanier
73 F.3d 1380 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)