United States v. David Ross Hesbett, AKA William George McIver
This text of 477 F.2d 566 (United States v. David Ross Hesbett, AKA William George McIver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed.2d 493, we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude *567 that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered that the motion filed by Frank C. Fariss for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for appellant is granted; the appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of new counsel is denied; and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. Minor, 5 Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521; United States v. Crawford, 5 Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
477 F.2d 566, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-ross-hesbett-aka-william-george-mciver-ca5-1973.