United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar
This text of United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar (United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 09 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50315
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:13-cr-03254-BTM-1 v.
DAVID ROSALES-AGUILAR, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 1, 2015 Submission Withdrawn March 21, 2017 Resubmitted November 9, 2017 Pasadena, California
Before: KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
California Health and Safety Code section 11352(a) is divisible. United
States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034, 1043 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. page 2 district court didn’t err by enhancing Rosales’s sentence. See United States v.
Rosales-Aguilar, 818 F.3d 965, 973 (9th Cir. 2016).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-rosales-aguilar-ca9-2017.