United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar. Read the opinion of the Court — 818 F.3d 965
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 9, 2017·No. 14-50315·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 09 2017

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50315

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.

3:13-cr-03254-BTM-1

v.

DAVID ROSALES-AGUILAR, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 1, 2015 Submission Withdrawn March 21, 2017 Resubmitted November 9, 2017 Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

California Health and Safety Code section 11352(a) is divisible. United

States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034, 1043 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

page 2

district court didn’t err by enhancing Rosales’s sentence. See United States v.

Rosales-Aguilar, 818 F.3d 965, 973 (9th Cir. 2016).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar, (9th Cir. 2017).

United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar (United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Melvin Martinez-Lopez
864 F.3d 1034 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)