United States v. David Pelowski
This text of 55 F. App'x 391 (United States v. David Pelowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
David Pelowski pled guilty to distributing 50 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(B)(viii). At sentencing, the district court 1 applied the Guidelines career-offender provision; denied Pelowski’s motion for a downward departure, which had been based upon overrepresentation of his criminal history and also upon the circumstances of one of the convictions underlying his career-offender status; and sentenced Pelowski to 188 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Pelowski appeals, arguing the district court mistakenly believed it lacked authority to depart downward based on the circumstances of his career-offender status as distinct from the over-representation of his general criminal history.
Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no indication the district court believed it lacked authority to depart downward on either basis. Consequently, Pelowski’s appeal argument is unreviewable. See United States v. Correa, 167 F.3d 414, 417 (8th Cir.1999).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
. The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 F. App'x 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-pelowski-ca8-2003.