United States v. David Olushina John
This text of 914 F.2d 1492 (United States v. David Olushina John) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
914 F.2d 1492
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David Olushina JOHN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-6580.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 20, 1990.
Decided Sept. 24, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Oct. 22, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR No. 83-226-M).
David Olushina John, appellant pro se.
Lawrence L. Hooper, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, SPROUSE, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David Olushina John appeals from the district court's order which denied his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. John, CR No. 83-226-M (D. Md. Apr. 18, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
914 F.2d 1492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-olushina-john-ca4-1990.