United States v. David Metcalf
This text of 441 F. App'x 254 (United States v. David Metcalf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. Appellant concedes his arguments are foreclosed by circuit precedent; to wit: United States v. Johnson, 632 F.3d 912 (5th Cir.2011); United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255 (5th Cir.2010); and United States v. Whaley, *255 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir.2009). Appellant also indicates that he raises the arguments for possible Supreme Court review. The judgment of the district court is SUMMARILY AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 F. App'x 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-metcalf-ca5-2011.