United States v. David Metcalf

Fifth Circuit

United States v. David Metcalf

441 F. App'x 254

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2011·No. 11-50050·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. Appellant concedes his arguments are foreclosed by circuit precedent; to wit: United States v. Johnson, 632 F.3d 912 (5th Cir.2011); United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255 (5th Cir.2010); and United States v. Whaley, *255 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir.2009). Appellant also indicates that he raises the arguments for possible Supreme Court review. The judgment of the district court is SUMMARILY AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. Appellant concedes his arguments are foreclosed by circuit precedent; to wit: United States v. Johnson, 632 F.3d 912 (5th Cir.2011); United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255 (5th Cir.2010); and United States v. Whaley, *255 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir.2009). Appellant also indicates that he raises the arguments for possible Supreme Court review. The judgment of the district court is SUMMARILY AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. David Metcalf, 441 F. App'x 254 (5th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

441 F. App'x 254 (United States v. David Metcalf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related