United States v. David Mendoza

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: December 20, 2018
• Docket: 18-10114
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10114

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:16-cr-00315-JGZ

v. MEMORANDUM* DAVID MANUEL MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2018**

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

David Manuel Mendoza appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.

Mendoza challenges the reasonableness of his 12-month sentence. Because

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). he has fully served that sentence, however, and he is not subject to a term of

supervised release, the appeal is moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d

1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999); see also United States v. King, 891 F.3d 868, 869-70

(9th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

2 18-10114