United States v. David Mednansky

622 F. App'x 643
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 10, 2015·No. 13-55662·Unpublished

Opinion

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on September 4, 2015, 2015 WL 5167842, is amended as follows:

On page 2, line 13, the text <83,3(g)(l)> is deleted and replaced with <83.3(f)(l)>.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. RApp. P. 35. Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

No further petitions shall be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. David Mednansky, 622 F. App'x 643 (9th Cir. 2015).

622 F. App'x 643 (United States v. David Mednansky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.