United States v. David Lane McGlothlin
This text of 52 F.3d 331 (United States v. David Lane McGlothlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 331
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
David Lane McGLOTHLIN, Appellant.
No. 94-3156EA.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Apr. 10, 1995.
Filed: Apr. 20, 1995.
Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
David Lane McGlothlin appeals his conviction for escape from the custody of the Attorney General. McGlothlin claims the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdict. On review, we must construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and affirm if there is substantial evidence to support the verdict. We conclude there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt the essential elements of the crime and McGlothlin's guilt. We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 331, 1995 WL 231346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-lane-mcglothlin-ca8-1995.