United States v. David Joseph Fakourey
This text of 60 F.3d 825 (United States v. David Joseph Fakourey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 825
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David Joseph FAKOUREY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-6564.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 13, 1995.
David Joseph Fakourey, Appellant Pro Se.
Paul Thomas Farrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, WV, for Appellee.
S.D.W.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's "Motion to Grant Bond Time as in Custody Time." We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fakourey, No. CR-93-237 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 17, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
We deny Appellant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 825, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24964, 1995 WL 419213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-joseph-fakourey-ca4-1995.