United States v. David Holiday
This text of United States v. David Holiday (United States v. David Holiday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-2891 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
David Holiday
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield ____________
Submitted: April 15, 2019 Filed: April 29, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. David Holiday appeals the district court’s1 order committing him under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, which provides for hospitalization and treatment of an imprisoned person suffering from a mental disease or defect, until he no longer needs treatment or his prison sentence expires, whichever occurs first. Upon careful review of the record--including the psychological evaluations of mental health professionals where Holiday is presently confined for treatment, and of defense counsel’s independent psychological examiner--we conclude the district court’s section 4245 finding was supported by a preponderance of the evidence, and was not clearly erroneous. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d); United States v. Bean, 373 F.3d 877, 879 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). We also conclude that Holiday’s pro se arguments offer no basis for relief.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________
1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. David Holiday, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-holiday-ca8-2019.