United States v. David Hill

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 17, 2012·No. 11-7636·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7636

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID HILL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)

Submitted: April 30, 2012 Decided: May 17, 2012

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Dabney P. Langhorne, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Hill appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for access to documentary exhibits admitted at his

criminal trial. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-

00191-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 17, 2011; entered Nov. 21,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. David Hill, (4th Cir. 2012).

United States v. David Hill (United States v. David Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.