United States v. David Henson McNab, Robert D. Blanford
Opinion
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS __________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 29, 2003 No. 01-15148 THOMAS K. KAHN __________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 00-00079-CR-1-RV
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID HENSON MCNAB, ROBERT D. BLANDFORD, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
___________________________
No. 02-10810 ___________________________
D. C. Docket No. 00-00079-CR-CB
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ABNER SCHOENWETTER, ROBERT D. BLANDFORD, Defendants-Appellants. _____________________________
No. 02-11264 _____________________________
D. C. Docket No. 00-00079-CR-1-RV
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID HENSON MCNAB, ABNER SCHOENWETTER, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________ (May 29, 2003)
Before HULL, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.
ORDERED:
The petitions for rehearing are granted in part by deleting entirely footnote
24 from the Court’s opinion which was issued on March 21, 2003. The Court will
issue a substituted opinion making that deletion. The Court otherwise denies the
petitions for rehearing of defendants’ McNabb, Schoenwetter, Huang, Blandford
and Embassy of Honduras.
2 No member of this Court having requested a poll, we deny the suggestion
for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a); Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5.
FAY, Circuit Judge, dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. David Henson McNab, Robert D. Blanford (United States v. David Henson McNab, Robert D. Blanford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.