United States v. David Fuller

25 F.3d 1041, 1994 WL 201003
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 1994
Docket94-6131
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1041 (United States v. David Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. David Fuller, 25 F.3d 1041, 1994 WL 201003 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

25 F.3d 1041
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
David FULLER, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6131.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-13-A, CA-93-1565-AM)

David Fuller, appellant pro se.

Mark Joseph Hulkower, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Fuller, Nos. CR-92-13-A; CA-93-1565-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Fuller raises additional facts in his informal brief; he can submit these facts to the district court for consideration in a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.3d 1041, 1994 WL 201003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-fuller-ca4-1994.