United States v. David Flores

535 F. App'x 623
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 2013
Docket12-50139
StatusUnpublished

This text of 535 F. App'x 623 (United States v. David Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. David Flores, 535 F. App'x 623 (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

David Jose Chavarria Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Chavarria Flores contends that the district court erred in assigning two criminal history points under U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(d) for committing the instant offense while under a criminal justice sentence. Cha-varria Flores’s contention is foreclosed by United States v. Reyes-Ceja, 712 F.3d 1284, 1287-90 (9th Cir.2013).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gustavo Reyes-Ceja
712 F.3d 1284 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
535 F. App'x 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-flores-ca9-2013.