United States v. David Flores
This text of 535 F. App'x 623 (United States v. David Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
David Jose Chavarria Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Chavarria Flores contends that the district court erred in assigning two criminal history points under U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(d) for committing the instant offense while under a criminal justice sentence. Cha-varria Flores’s contention is foreclosed by United States v. Reyes-Ceja, 712 F.3d 1284, 1287-90 (9th Cir.2013).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
535 F. App'x 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-flores-ca9-2013.