United States v. David Burleson
This text of 372 F. App'x 763 (United States v. David Burleson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
David Burleson appeals from his 16-month sentence imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for unlawful possession of Postal Keys, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1704. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Burleson contends that his sentence four months above the United States Sentencing Guidelines range is substantively unreasonable. A review of the record demonstrates that the district court did not procedurally err and the sentence is not substantively unreasonable in light of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3558(a) and the totality of the circumstances. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Truong, 587 F.3d 1049, 1052 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (affirming an above-Guidelines sentence where the district court “sufficiently explained that the Guidelines did not account for [defendant’s] particular type of recidivism”).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
372 F. App'x 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-burleson-ca9-2010.