United States v. David Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2014·No. 13-51099·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 13-51099 Document: 00512751353 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-51099 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED August 29, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID DEON BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:13-CR-121-1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent David Deon Brown has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brown has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Brown’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-51099 Document: 00512751353 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014

No. 13-51099

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. David Brown, (5th Cir. 2014).

United States v. David Brown (United States v. David Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)