United States v. David Brian Bern

219 F. App'x 599
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 20, 2007
Docket06-1746
StatusUnpublished

This text of 219 F. App'x 599 (United States v. David Brian Bern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. David Brian Bern, 219 F. App'x 599 (8th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Bern appeals his sentence of 300 months in prison, a variance below the advisory Guidelines range of 360 months to life, imposed by the district court 1 following a remand for resentencing pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), see United States v. Bern, 156 Fed.Appx. 861 (8th Cir.2005) (unpublished per curiam). For reversal, Bern argues that recent Supreme Court decisions warrant re-examination of whether the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard of proof is sufficient for purposes of sentencing enhancements. We disagree. See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 551 n. 4 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (Booker does not require sentencing judges to find sentence-enhancing facts beyond reasonable doubt), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 266, 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Louis F. Pirani
406 F.3d 543 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. David Brian Bern
156 F. App'x 861 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 F. App'x 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-brian-bern-ca8-2007.