United States v. David Barren
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7122
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID BARREN, a/k/a James Willie Jones, a/k/a Vincent Hutchins,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1)
Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Barren, Appellant Pro Se. Mushtaq Zakir Gunja, Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Barren appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his motions for full disclosure of
the grand jury minutes and jury list and to compel discovery.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Barren, No. 8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1 (D. Md.
June 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. David Barren (United States v. David Barren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.