United States v. David Apple

Fourth Circuit

United States v. David Apple

417 F.2d 1070

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 8, 1969

Docket13246_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 417 F.2d 1070 (United States v. David Apple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. David Apple, 417 F.2d 1070 (4th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Indicted for knowingly transporting from New York to Maryland matter of indecent and immoral character for purpose of sale and distribution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1465, David Apple was convicted in December 1968, after a jury-waived trial, by the District Court at Baltimore. He appeals, but we find no substance in his assignments of error. The points he now makes are well answered in the opinion of Chief Judge Thomsen, D.C., 305 F.Supp. 330, stating the finding of guilt, and on that document we affirm the judgment on review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Indicted for knowingly transporting from New York to Maryland matter of indecent and immoral character for purpose of sale and distribution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1465, David Apple was convicted in December 1968, after a jury-waived trial, by the District Court at Baltimore. He appeals, but we find no substance in his assignments of error. The points he now makes are well answered in the opinion of Chief Judge Thomsen, D.C., 305 F.Supp. 330, stating the finding of guilt, and on that document we affirm the judgment on review.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 F.2d 1070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-apple-ca4-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack