United States v. David Anderson

667 F. App'x 151
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 2016
Docket15-50719
StatusUnpublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 151 (United States v. David Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. David Anderson, 667 F. App'x 151 (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

David Lee Anderson appeals the 293-month within-guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. Anderson pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement wherein he waived the right to appeal his, conviction and sentence on any ground, reserving only a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel or prose-cutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension.

Although Anderson argues that his appeal waiver is unenforceable, our review of the record shows that the waiver was knowing and voluntary, as he knew that he had the right to appeal and that he was giving up that right by entering into the plea agreement. See United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1994). Thus, the waiver, which has been invoked by the Government in this appeal, precludes consideration of Anderson’s challenge to the substantive reasonableness of his sentence. See United States v. Walters, 732 F.3d 489, 491 (5th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bond
414 F.3d 542 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Nicholas Arthur Portillo
18 F.3d 290 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Tommy Walters
732 F.3d 489 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-anderson-ca5-2016.