United States v. Dave Taylor

694 F. App'x 209
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 9, 2017
Docket17-6388
StatusUnpublished

This text of 694 F. App'x 209 (United States v. Dave Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dave Taylor, 694 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

*210 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order construing his second motion to reduce sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Guidelines as a motion to reconsider and denying it for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2017). We deny Taylor’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
694 F. App'x 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dave-taylor-ca4-2017.