United States v. Dave Diamond
This text of 356 U.S. 257 (United States v. Dave Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
78 S.Ct. 715
2 L.Ed.2d 757
UNITED STATES of America, petitioner,
v.
Dave DIAMOND, also known as David Dumanus, David Thornson, and Abe Slater, and Freeda, Diamond, also known as Frieda Diamond and Florence Slater.
No. 771.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 7, 1958
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mr. J. F. Bishop, for the United States.
Mr. Robert L. Brock, for respondent David Diamond.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 U.S. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dave-diamond-scotus-1958.