United States v. Darryle Robertson
This text of United States v. Darryle Robertson (United States v. Darryle Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7406
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYLE EDWARD ROBERTSON, a/k/a Tiger,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:01-cr-00304-GLR-3)
Submitted: February 24, 2022 Decided: March 2, 2022
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryle Edward Robertson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Darryle Edward Robertson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions
for compassionate release and reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Darryle Robertson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-darryle-robertson-ca4-2022.