United States v. Darron Hill

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 2020
Docket19-2506
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Darron Hill (United States v. Darron Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Darron Hill, (8th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-2506 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Darron Van Hill

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________

Submitted: April 1, 2020 Filed: April 6, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Darron Van Hill appeals after he conditionally pleaded guilty to a firearms offense, and the district court1 imposed a 24-month prison sentence. His counsel has

1 The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the district court’s denial of a motion to suppress. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court properly denied the motion. See United States v. Donnelly, 475 F.3d 946, 951 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review); see also United States v. Shackleford, 830 F.3d 751, 753 (8th Cir. 2016) (stating that probable cause to believe that an automobile contains contraband or evidence of criminal activity justifies the warrantless search of the automobile and seizure of the contraband).

Finally, having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Kevin P. Donnelly
475 F.3d 946 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Javon Shackleford
830 F.3d 751 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Darron Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-darron-hill-ca8-2020.