United States v. Darrin Soza

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Darrin Soza. Read the opinion of the Court — 874 F.3d 884
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2018·No. 18-40386·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 18-40386 Document: 00514737796 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/27/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals

No. 18-40386 Fifth Circuit

FILED Conference Calendar November 27, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DARRIN ANTONIO SOZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-809-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Darrin Antonio Soza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Soza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-40386 Document: 00514737796 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/27/2018

No. 18-40386

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Darrin Soza, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Darrin Soza (United States v. Darrin Soza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)