United States v. Darrell E. Carter

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 5, 1996·No. 96-1153·Unpublished

Opinion

No. 96-1153WA

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Darrell Edward Carter, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

Submitted: June 28, 1996

Filed: July 5, 1996

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Edward Carter appeals the district court's denial of Carter's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Carter contends the government's seizure and administrative forfeiture of his two vehicles, in proceedings he did not contest, constituted punishment for his drug offenses and thus barred his later criminal prosecution and conviction. Carter's contention is foreclosed by the contrary holdings of the United States Supreme Court and this court. See United States v. Ursery, No. 95-345, 1996 WL 340815, at *3 (U.S. June 24, 1996); United States v. Sykes, 73 F.3d 772, 773-74 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 64 U.S.L.W. 3821 (U.S. June 10, 1996). We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Darrell E. Carter, (8th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Darrell E. Carter (United States v. Darrell E. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lamond Sykes, Also Known as Q
73 F.3d 772 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)