United States v. Darnall
144 F. App'x 103
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 2005
DocketNo. 04-13140; D.C. Docket No. 04-14009-CR-DMM
StatusPublished
This text of 144 F. App'x 103 (United States v. Darnall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Darnall, 144 F. App'x 103 (11th Cir. 2005).
Opinion
Having reviewed the briefs and considered argument of counsel, we find no error as to Appellant’s conviction or sentence. See United States v. Lebovitz, 401 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir.2005); United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir.2005); United States v. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir.2004). Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Anthony F. Murrell
368 F.3d 1283 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. David Lebovitz
401 F.3d 1263 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Rodriguez
398 F.3d 1291 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
144 F. App'x 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-darnall-ca11-2005.