United States v. Darnall
144 F. App'x 103
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 23, 2005·No. No. 04-13140; D.C. Docket No. 04-14009-CR-DMM·Published
Opinion
Having reviewed the briefs and considered argument of counsel, we find no error as to Appellant’s conviction or sentence. See United States v. Lebovitz, 401 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir.2005); United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir.2005); United States v. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir.2004). Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Darnall, 144 F. App'x 103 (11th Cir. 2005).
144 F. App'x 103 (United States v. Darnall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Anthony F. Murrell
368 F.3d 1283 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. David Lebovitz
401 F.3d 1263 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Rodriguez
398 F.3d 1291 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)