United States v. Danylo

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Danylo

73 M.J. 47, 2013 CAAF LEXIS 1059

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces

DecidedSeptember 11, 2013

DocketNo. 13-0570/AF

StatusPublished

This text of 73 M.J. 47 (United States v. Danylo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Danylo, 73 M.J. 47, 2013 CAAF LEXIS 1059 (Ark. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

CCA 37916. Review granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE ONLY CONSIDERED THE PERIOD OF TIME FOR APPELLANT’S ARTICLE 62 APPEAL FOR THE PURPOSES OF APPELLANT’S SPEEDY TRIAL MOTION.

II. WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL WHEN HIS COURT-MARTIAL OCCURRED 350 DAYS AFTER HE WAS PLACED IN PRETRIAL CONFINEMENT.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 37916. Review granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE ONLY CONSIDERED THE PERIOD OF TIME FOR APPELLANT’S ARTICLE 62 APPEAL FOR THE PURPOSES OF APPELLANT’S SPEEDY TRIAL MOTION.

II. WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL WHEN HIS COURT-MARTIAL OCCURRED 350 DAYS AFTER HE WAS PLACED IN PRETRIAL CONFINEMENT.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 M.J. 47, 2013 CAAF LEXIS 1059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-danylo-armfor-2013.