United States v. Dantzler

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Dantzler

169 F. App'x 173

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2006·No. No. 05-7016·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Harry L. Dantzler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend the complaint, Fed.R.Civ.P. 15. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Dantzler, No. CR-01-831 (D.S.C. June 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Harry L. Dantzler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend the complaint, Fed.R.Civ.P. 15. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Dantzler, No. CR-01-831 (D.S.C. June 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Dantzler, 169 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

169 F. App'x 173 (United States v. Dantzler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.