United States v. Daniels

25 F. Cas. 752, 20 Int. Rev. Rec. 136

This text of 25 F. Cas. 752 (United States v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Daniels, 25 F. Cas. 752, 20 Int. Rev. Rec. 136 (circtndoh 1874).

Opinion

On motion for a new trial.

The firm of Daniels and Son on the 1st day of May, 1S73. paid a special tax for the business of wholesale dealers in liquor at San-dusky. The firm consisted of Eve Daniels, the mother, and George Daniels, the son. In August, 1873, Eve died, leaving George her only heir and representative, and also-surviving partner, who continued the business at the same place for the remainder of the year in the name of Daniels and Son. Held, that having paid the tax for the whole year, George Daniels was not required to do so again under the law, on the death of his mother and partner, and .having been convicted a new trial is granted herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. Cas. 752, 20 Int. Rev. Rec. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniels-circtndoh-1874.