United States v. Daniels
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-11418 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JASON AARON DANIELS,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:96-CR-36-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jason Aaron Daniels appeals from his sentence following his
guilty plea conviction for theft from a bank. Daniels argues
that the district court plainly erred in imposing a two-level
upward adjustment for Daniels’ managerial or supervisory role in
the offense pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1. We have reviewed the
record and the briefs of the parties and hold that the district
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-11418 - 2 -
court committed no error, plain or otherwise. § 3B1.1(c); United
States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380, 395 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Daniels (United States v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.