United States v. Danielle Kownacki

674 F. App'x 761
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2017
Docket15-50503
StatusUnpublished

This text of 674 F. App'x 761 (United States v. Danielle Kownacki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Danielle Kownacki, 674 F. App'x 761 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Danielle Trinitti Kownacki appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 63-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for importation of heroin and methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Kownacki argues that the district court erred in denying a minor role reduction to her base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. The district court did not clearly err in finding, based on Kownacki’s level of involvement in the drug trafficking scheme and the remuneration she received, that she was not “substantially less culpable” than the average participant in the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A); United States v. Hurtado, 760 F.3d 1065, 1068 (9th Cir. 2014). Contrary to Kownacki’s contention, a different result is not required under the factors enumerated in Amendment 794 to the minor role Guideline, see U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C) (2015), which was in effect at the time of Kownacki’s sentencing and discussed at the sentencing hearing.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hector Hurtado
760 F.3d 1065 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 F. App'x 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-danielle-kownacki-ca9-2017.