United States v. Danielle Facchini

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Danielle Facchini

851 F.2d 1221, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13318

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 14, 1988

Docket86-3154

StatusPublished

This text of 851 F.2d 1221 (United States v. Danielle Facchini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Danielle Facchini, 851 F.2d 1221, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13318 (9th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

851 F.2d 1221

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Danielle FACCHINI, et al. Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 86-3094, 86-3097 to 86-3102, 86-3104 to 86-3111,
86-3117, 86-3118, 86-3121 to 86-3123, 86-3127 to
86-3128, 86-3137 to 86-3140, 86-3148,
86-3154, 86-3161, 86-3177.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 14, 1988.

Prior report: 832 F.2d 1159.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the nonrecused active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI