United States v. Daniel Thomas Villella

459 F.2d 1028, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9627
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 11, 1972
Docket72-1010
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 459 F.2d 1028 (United States v. Daniel Thomas Villella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Daniel Thomas Villella, 459 F.2d 1028, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9627 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Villella appeals from a conviction of illegal importation of heroin and possession of heroin with intent to distribute, as well as conspiracy to commit these acts, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, 841(a)(1), 963 and 846, respectively. We affirm.

Villella was arrested June 6, 1971, and released on bail September 13, 1971, two days before the commencement of trial. On September 14, his counsel moved for a continuance on the ground that appellant had been unable to aid counsel in locating two defense witnesses. No attempt had been made to locate the two witnesses; no good reason was advanced why his counsel could not have searched for them with the help of his client’s direction. The denial of the motion was within the court’s discretion. See United States v. Harris, 9 Cir., 1970, 436 F.2d 775, 776.

Villella also claims that his arrest was illegal. Whatever the merits of this contention, it is irrelevant for purposes of reviewing his conviction. See Frisbie v. Collins, 1952, 342 U.S. 519, 522, 72 S.Ct. 509, 96 L.Ed. 541; Albrecht v. United States, 1927, 273 U.S. 1, 8, 47 S. Ct. 250, 71 L.Ed. 505. The arrest did not produce evidence that was used against him.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
459 F.2d 1028, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniel-thomas-villella-ca9-1972.