United States v. Daniel Sperdutto

Second Circuit

United States v. Daniel Sperdutto

263 F.2d 837, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4299

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 1959

Docket25495

StatusPublished

This text of 263 F.2d 837 (United States v. Daniel Sperdutto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Daniel Sperdutto, 263 F.2d 837, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4299 (2d Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

263 F.2d 837

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel SPERDUTTO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 264, Docket 25495.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 3, 1959.
Decided March 3, 1959.

Bernard R. Lieberman, New York City, for appellant.

James G. Starkey, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Arthur H. Christy, U.S. Atty., and Mark F. Hughes, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed in open court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI