United States v. Daniel Siddons

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Daniel Siddons. Read the opinion of the Court — 660 F.3d 699
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 7, 2011·No. 10-1350·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 10-1350

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DANIEL R. SIDDONS,

Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. Crim. No. 07-cr-00717-001)

District Judge: Honorable Paul S. Diamond

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

September 13, 2011

Before: RENDELL, JORDAN and BARRY, Circuit Judges

(Opinion Filed: October 5, 2011)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

As it appears that the opinion entered in the above matter on October 5, 2011, contained a typographical error, it is hereby

ORDERED that the opinion be amended to correct “leading guilty” to “pleading guilty” on line 8 of text on page 5.

By the Court,

/s/Maryanne Trump Barry Circuit Judge

Dated: October 7, 2011

MB/cc: Ashley K. Lunkenheimer, Esq.

Todd E. Henry, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Daniel Siddons, (3d Cir. 2011).

United States v. Daniel Siddons (United States v. Daniel Siddons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.