United States v. Daniel M. Kenstler

Third Circuit

United States v. Daniel M. Kenstler

377 F.2d 559, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6167

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 31, 1967

Docket16037

StatusPublished

This text of 377 F.2d 559 (United States v. Daniel M. Kenstler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Daniel M. Kenstler, 377 F.2d 559, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6167 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

377 F.2d 559

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Daniel M. KENSTLER, Appellant.

No. 16037.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 22, 1967.
Decided May 31, 1967.

Michael Hahalyak, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

George E. Schumacher, Asst. U.S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Gustave Diamond, U.S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

On review of the record we find no error. The judgment of sentence of the District Court, D.C., 250 F.Supp. 833, will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI