United States v. Daniel Lee Firestone

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Daniel Lee Firestone

838 F.2d 1210, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1418, 1988 WL 9624

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 4, 1988

Docket87-7708

StatusUnpublished

This text of 838 F.2d 1210 (United States v. Daniel Lee Firestone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Daniel Lee Firestone, 838 F.2d 1210, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1418, 1988 WL 9624 (4th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

838 F.2d 1210
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel Lee FIRESTONE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-7708.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 28, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 4, 1988.

Daniel Lee Firestone, appellant pro se.

John Perry Alderman, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Firestone, CR No. 84-18-R; C/A No. 87-313-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 5, 1987).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI