United States v. Daniel Koenig

Third Circuit

United States v. Daniel Koenig

462 F.2d 614, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8880

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1972

Docket71-1628

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 462 F.2d 614 (United States v. Daniel Koenig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Daniel Koenig, 462 F.2d 614, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8880 (3d Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

*615 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s pro se pleading in the district court seeks relief from a custodial sentence imposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4208(c). The pleading, construed as a motion pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P. 35, was filed more than 120 days after final sentence, and thus was untimely. See United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 226, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960). Construed as a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The sentence is within the range authorized by the statute, and the fact that pieces of a bullet lodged in appellant’s brain during the robbery of which he was convicted in no way affects the legality of his confinement.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*615 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s pro se pleading in the district court seeks relief from a custodial sentence imposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4208(c). The pleading, construed as a motion pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P. 35, was filed more than 120 days after final sentence, and thus was untimely. See United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 226, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960). Construed as a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The sentence is within the range authorized by the statute, and the fact that pieces of a bullet lodged in appellant’s brain during the robbery of which he was convicted in no way affects the legality of his confinement.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

462 F.2d 614, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniel-koenig-ca3-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack