United States v. Daniel Kemp, Sr.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Daniel Kemp, Sr.. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 F.4th 539
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 8, 2025·No. 25-6195·Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6195 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/08/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6195

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL N. KEMP, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:19-cr-00149-BO-2)

Submitted: July 21, 2025 Decided: August 8, 2025

Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel N. Kemp, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6195 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/08/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel N. Kemp, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his postjudgment

motions for release of garnished funds, fee-free copies, change of venue or recusal, and

appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Kemp, No. 5:19-cr-

00149-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Daniel Kemp, Sr., (4th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Daniel Kemp, Sr. (United States v. Daniel Kemp, Sr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.