United States v. Daniel J. Whitt
This text of 16 F.3d 1229 (United States v. Daniel J. Whitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
16 F.3d 1229
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Daniel J. WHITT, Appellant.
No. 93-1762WM.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: February 18, 1994.
Filed: February 23, 1994.
Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Daniel J. Whitt appeals his convictions for robbing two financial institutions. Whitt contends the prosecutor committed plain error in examining eye witnesses to the robberies about their pretrial photographic identifications of Whitt as the person who committed the crimes. Whitt also contends the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdict. Discussion of the issues presented by this appeal will serve no useful purpose. We have carefully considered Whitt's contentions and find them to be without merit. Thus, we affirm Whitt's convictions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F.3d 1229, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8647, 1994 WL 51429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniel-j-whitt-ca8-1994.