United States v. Daniel F. Ward

55 F. App'x 393
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 2003
Docket02-3292
StatusUnpublished

This text of 55 F. App'x 393 (United States v. Daniel F. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Daniel F. Ward, 55 F. App'x 393 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Ward pleaded guilty to health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1347 and 2. After increasing Ward’s base offense level for abusing a position of public or private trust, the district court 1 imposed a sentence of 5 months imprisonment and 5 months home detention, 3 years supervised release, and restitution of $49,944.01. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court erred in applying the abuse-of-trust increase.

The district court did not err. Ward occupied a position of trust — which he abused — with respect to Medicare, because he was able to defraud Medicare by certifying that in his professional judgment *394 treatment was medically necessary and had been provided. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3, comment, (n.l); United States v. Hodge, 259 F.3d 549, 556-57 (6th Cir.2001); United States v. Hoogenboom, 209 F.3d 665, 671 (7th Cir.2000); United States v. Rut-gard, 116 F.3d 1270, 1293 (9th Cir.1997). Further, having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

A true copy.

1

. The HONORABLE HOWARD F. SACHS, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Jeffrey Jay Rutgard
116 F.3d 1270 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Carol Hoogenboom
209 F.3d 665 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Joseph Lonnie Hodge
259 F.3d 549 (Sixth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 F. App'x 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniel-f-ward-ca8-2003.