United States v. Daniel F. Ward
This text of 55 F. App'x 393 (United States v. Daniel F. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
Daniel Ward pleaded guilty to health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1347 and 2. After increasing Ward’s base offense level for abusing a position of public or private trust, the district court 1 imposed a sentence of 5 months imprisonment and 5 months home detention, 3 years supervised release, and restitution of $49,944.01. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court erred in applying the abuse-of-trust increase.
The district court did not err. Ward occupied a position of trust — which he abused — with respect to Medicare, because he was able to defraud Medicare by certifying that in his professional judgment *394 treatment was medically necessary and had been provided. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3, comment, (n.l); United States v. Hodge, 259 F.3d 549, 556-57 (6th Cir.2001); United States v. Hoogenboom, 209 F.3d 665, 671 (7th Cir.2000); United States v. Rut-gard, 116 F.3d 1270, 1293 (9th Cir.1997). Further, having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
A true copy.
. The HONORABLE HOWARD F. SACHS, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 F. App'x 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniel-f-ward-ca8-2003.