United States v. Daniel Ernest Hayes

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Daniel Ernest Hayes

451 F.2d 1228

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 3, 1971

Docket26908

StatusPublished

This text of 451 F.2d 1228 (United States v. Daniel Ernest Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Daniel Ernest Hayes, 451 F.2d 1228 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant attacks his conviction for a violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, on the ground that the evidence was inadequate to prove his knowledge that the vehicle he was driving had been stolen and to prove the requisite specific intent.

There was ample evidence to sustain the conviction. The district court did not believe Hayes’ explanation about his possession of the automobile or his testimony denying knowledge of the theft. It had no obligation to credit his testimony.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant attacks his conviction for a violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, on the ground that the evidence was inadequate to prove his knowledge that the vehicle he was driving had been stolen and to prove the requisite specific intent.

There was ample evidence to sustain the conviction. The district court did not believe Hayes’ explanation about his possession of the automobile or his testimony denying knowledge of the theft. It had no obligation to credit his testimony.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

451 F.2d 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniel-ernest-hayes-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack